Legal Opinion
Scottsdale Insurance v. Flowers
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 16, 2008No. 06-6385, 06-6412PublishedCited by 646 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Kathleen Burke (“Burke”) appeals the district court’s amended order granting Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company’s (“Scottsdale”) motion for declaratory judgment. Burke argues that the district court abused its discretion in exercising jurisdiction over the case pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (2000), and erred in its determination that Norman Flowers (“Flowers”), a therapist at the Morton Center, was not covered by the Morton Center’s liability insurance policy with Scottsdale for tort damages arising from Flowers’ sexual…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by646 opinions
- Jeffery Emard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Barany-Snyder v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Russell Marcilis, II v. Township of RedfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Info-Hold, Inc. v. Sound Merchandising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Essex Hayward v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
641 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.