Legal Opinion

De La Cruz v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 24, 1998No. 2 CA-CV 97-0056PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLÓREZ, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants, the State of Arizona, the Industrial Commission, and its Division of Occupational Safety and Health (ADOSH) (collectively, the State), appeal from an adverse jury verdict in a "wrongful death action appellee Helen de la Cruz brought following the death of her husband, Rodolfo, in a construction accident. The State claims the trial court erred in denying its motion for a directed verdict, arguing it owed no duty to Rodolfo. 1 Because the existence of a duty is a legal question, Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board, 146 Ariz. 352, 706 P.2d 364 (1985),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. DeVries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Bither v. Country Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API