Legal Opinion

Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 1, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 07-0817PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 The essential question in this case is whether regulations and a policy adopted by the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (“AHCCCS”) thwart the legislature’s determination to provide dentures when “medically necessary” to those who qualify for AHCCCS coverage. Determining that the AHCCCS policy and regulations do just that, we reverse the superior court’s decision affirming the denial of Plaintiff-Appellant Bridget Sharpe’s (“Sharpe”) request for full upper and lower dentures.

I

¶ 2 Sharpe is AHCCCS eligible and enrolled with the Mercy Care Plan (“Mercy Care”)…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Walker v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Pinal Vista Properties, L.L.C. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brumett v. MGA Home Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Alejandro v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. City of Tempe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. In re KeelerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API