S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARBARINO, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 We are called upon to determine the effect, if any, that a disclaimer of warranties, or an “as is” provision, in a purchase contract for commercial property has on a vendor’s duty'to disclose defects in the physical condition of a property being sold. We hold that latent defects in a property sold “as is” that are known to the vendor must be disclosed to the purchaser. We also hold that a vendor may be held liable for negligent nondisclosure of facts basic to the transaction when the purchaser is precluded by the vendor from discovering those facts.
¶ 2…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Jefferson Associates, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Bauer v. GiannisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Security Title Agency, Inc. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.