Legal Opinion

S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 30, 2001No. 1 CA-CV-00-0347PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 We are called upon to determine the effect, if any, that a disclaimer of warranties, or an “as is” provision, in a purchase contract for commercial property has on a vendor’s duty'to disclose defects in the physical condition of a property being sold. We hold that latent defects in a property sold “as is” that are known to the vendor must be disclosed to the purchaser. We also hold that a vendor may be held liable for negligent nondisclosure of facts basic to the transaction when the purchaser is precluded by the vendor from discovering those facts.

¶ 2…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Amstadt v. United States Brass Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Jefferson Associates, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Bauer v. GiannisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Security Title Agency, Inc. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API