Legal Opinion

Richey v. Western Pacific Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 17, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 5005PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellees were granted summary judgment on their amended counterclaim charging appellants with wrongful filing of a lis pendens.

The undisputed facts disclose that appellants brought suit to collect a real estate commission from appellees, and on November 30, 1983, summary judgment was entered in appellants’ favor and against Western Pacific for the underlying commission in the amount of $8,000. Shortly after commencing the lawsuit, appellants filed a lis pendens which gave notice of the lawsuit and stated that “[T]he Plaintiff is seeking to enforce rights which may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Superior Court for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stewart v. FaheyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. City of Phoenix v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Kelly v. PerryArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Trickel v. Rainbo Baking Company of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Coventry Homes, Inc. v. Scottscom PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Evergreen West, Inc. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. West Pinal Family Health Center, Inc. v. McBrydeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Hatch Companies Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API