Legal Opinion

Hatch Companies Contracting, Inc. v. Arizona Bank

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 24, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-623PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Presiding Judge.

Hatch Companies Contracting, Inc. (Hatch) appeals from a summary judgment for The Arizona Bank, the predecessor in interest to appellee Security Pacific Bank of Arizona (Bank), awarding it statutory damages of $5,000 pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-420 and costs and attorney’s fees of $3,500 for Hatch’s wrongful filing of a lis pendens. Hatch raises three issues on appeal:

1. Did the bank lack standing to question the validity of the lis pendens and to recover damages and fees under A.R.S. § 33-420(A)?

2. Where a bond has been filed to discharge a mechanics’ lien pursuant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Stewart v. FaheyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. Kelly v. PerryArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Coventry Homes, Inc. v. Scottscom PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Evergreen West, Inc. v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. SWC Baseline & Crismon Investors, L.L.C. v. Augusta Ranch Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Delmastro & Eells v. Taco Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Karl v. US Bank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Santa Fe Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. BartschiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API