Legal Opinion

Hermond Ragland v. The Shattuck National Bank, and Triple Sons Ranch, Inc., D/B/A Triple Sons Shattuck Farms and Peter R. Ferguson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1994No. 93-6270PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.

In this action, the defendant Shattuck National Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Bank”) appeals a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Hermond Ragland. The jury found that defendant was liable for fraud and negligent misrepresentation and awarded plaintiff actual damages of $710,782.13.

The Bank appeals, claiming that plaintiff Ragland was not the real party in interest, that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s finding of fraud and negligent misrepresentation, or the damages awarded, and that certain evidence was improperly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barrett v. TallonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Faulkenberry v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Hugh L. Bennett v. Bobby Joe LongacreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Stapleton v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gretchen Getter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. In Re SemCrude L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  4. NationsBank v. Commercial Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Commercial Financial Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Schlanger Insurance Trust v. John Hancock Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API