State v. Margay Oil Corporation
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
The appellee in each of these two cases is a foreign corporation whose stock does not express any par value, the stock of each of the corporations being what is termed non-par-value stock. Each of the corporations entered the State several years ago and paid its respective franchise tax up to the year 1923, when the present controversy arose over the basis on which the franchise tax should be imposed, and these actions were instituted by appellee to restrain the Attorney General from enforcing what is claimed by appellees to be unjust exactions with respect to this tax.
The General Assembly of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Bass, Ratcliff & Gretton, Ltd. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wallace v. HinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Hump Hairpin Manufacturing Co. v. EmmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- New York v. LatrobeSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- State v. Pierce Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Gilliland Oil Co. v. State Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973