Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Paul

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 1, 1897PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The first case on appeal from Saline Circnit. Alexander M. Dupeie, Judge. Tbe second two cases on appeal from Craighead Circuit Court, Jonesboro District. William H. Cate, Judge. The act of March 25, 1889, is unconstitutional and void, because: (1) It is violative of § 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States. 13 Fed. Rep. 757; 96 U. S. 529; 43 Mich. 141, 147; 4 Wall. 325; 92 U. S. 268; 95 id. 472; 49 Ark. 494; 113 Pa.

Read the full summary

The first case on appeal from Saline Circnit. Alexander M. Dupeie, Judge. Tbe second two cases on appeal from Craighead Circuit Court, Jonesboro District. William H. Cate, Judge. The act of March 25, 1889, is unconstitutional and void, because: (1) It is violative of § 1 of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of the United States. 13 Fed. Rep. 757; 96 U. S. 529; 43 Mich. 141, 147; 4 Wall. 325; 92 U. S. 268; 95 id. 472; 49 Ark. 494; 113 Pa. St. 431; 33 W. Ya. 431; 117 111. 294; 19 S. W. Rep. 910; 90 N. Y. 52; 34 Cent. L. J. 78; 23 Fed. Rep. 791; 6 Neb. 37; 22 S. W. Rep. 351, 352; 31…

1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.

The appellees, Charles Paul, John Boland and Fritz Whiddiek, were day laborers in the employment, respectively, of the appellants, the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company, and the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Mem - phis Railroad Company; one earning one dollar and twenty-five cents a day, and each of the other two one dollar and thirty-five cents. Their employers discharged them without paying the wages they had, respectively, earned; and each brought a suit against his debtor for the amount due him, and the damages allowed by the act of the general assembly of the State of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. LyttakerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ballard v. Mississippi Cotton Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Butler v. Board of Directors of Fourche Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API