Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Hines

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 3, 1920No. 683PublishedCited by 133 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an appeal from an order of three judges restraining the defendants, the appellants, from taking steps to enforce taxes imposed by . an Act of North Dakota, approved March 7, 1919, (c. 222,) until the further order of the Court. ' The plaintiff railroads are corporations of other States with lines extending into North Dakota. The defendants are the State Tax Commissioner, the State Treasurer, the State Auditor, the Attorney General and the Secretary, of State for North, Dakota. As the tax is made a first lien upon all the property of the plaintiff railroads in the State and thus puts a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Fargo v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Union Tank Line Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Freeman v. HewitSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Township of Hillsborough v. CromwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Dana Leigh Thompson v. County of Franklin, William A. Hughes, Treasurer of Franklin CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API