Legal Opinion
In Re Peter Larson, in Re Neal Larson Robert Farrar Black Hills Institute of Geological Research Terry Wentz Edwin Allen Cole Jun Shimizu
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 29, 1994No. 94-3488, 94-3538PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Peter and Neal Larson, four other individuals associated with the Black Hills Institute of Geological Research (the Institute), and the Institute (collectively referred to as Petitioners) petition this court for a writ of mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. Petitioners seek a writ instructing that court to: (1) vacate its order denying Petitioners’ motions for recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and (b)(1);1 and (2) recuse itself from any further proceedings in the underlying criminal action. We deny the petition.
I. BACKGROUND
This…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re J. P. Linahan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- In Re Steven LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Mitchell Antar, in 94-5228. United States of America v. Eddie Antar, in 94-5230Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Margarita Selkridge v. United of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Scholes v. LehmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.