Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell Antar, in 94-5228. United States of America v. Eddie Antar, in 94-5230

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 1995No. 94-5228 and 94-5230PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

The final judgments of sentence and conviction from which the defendants appealed marked the culmination of a decades-long rise and fall of an electronics retail chain called Crazy Eddie and the family that ran the company. When all was said and done, the saga involved: a New York-based chain which achieved enormous success over the past few decades in large part due to the company’s aggressive advertising; an alleged behind the scenes sophisticated family-run conspiracy to operate Crazy Eddie in an unlawful manner, which allegedly netted the defendants millions of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. JasinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Securacomm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Posada-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API