Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Byrom
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 2, 2004No. 1021113PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Richard Byrom sued his former employer Ceasco, Inc., d/b/a Skill Lube, for workers' compensation benefits for injuries he suffered from an on-the-job lightning strike. After trial on oral testimony and written exhibits, the trial court entered an order which reads, in pertinent part:
"I. FINDINGS OF FACTS.
"1. On July 24, 1998, Richard Byrom (Plaintiff) suffered injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant Ceasco, Inc., d/b/a Skill Lube. Plaintiff's injuries occurred when a telephone he was using was struck by lightning. He immediately felt severe pain on the left…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Ex Parte Toyota Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. PattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. MuilenburgCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Hollinghead v. Willstaff, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Brown v. Patton, 2070810 (ala.civ.app. 4-17-2009)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Dolgencorp, Inc. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.