Bausman v. Faue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, where the action was tried by Lochren, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Gilfillan, C. J.1
The action is under the statute to determine adverse claims to real estate, the complaint alleging that the plaintiffs are the owners in fee, and that it is vacant. The answer denies the allegations of the complaint, except that defendant claims some right, title, and interest in the real estate; alleges that defendant is the owner; and as a further defence sets forth facts which are substantially found by the court below. That court, trying the case without a jury, found the facts, and as a conclusion of law found plaintiffs to be the owners, subject to equities existing in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pence v. ArbuckleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Bausman v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Bottineau v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Meley v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Merchant v. WoodsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Macomber v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Bahar v. Tadros Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- Mathews v. LightnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.