Legal Opinion
Bahar v. Tadros Etc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1953No. 18,397PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKendall, C. J.
The appellants, husbánd and wife, brought this action to determine their interest in a certain lot in Michigan City, Indiana, upon which they had' constructed a building.
The issues were formed by a second amended complaint consisting of three paragraphs, (1) to quiet title to real estate therein described; (2) relief under the occupying claimant act for improvements made by them on said real estate; (3) that the sum of $25,000.00 be declared a lien on said real estate; and that a certain deed be declared a mortgage and be foreclosed, and that the real estate, or so much thereof that was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kirk v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Hill v. EpleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Cole v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kahf v. Charleston South ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Canada Dry Corporation v. Nehi Beverage Company, Inc. Of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Erie-Haven, Inc. v. First Church of ChristIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Hutter v. WeissIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Carsten v. EickhoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.