Legal Opinion

Rubinfeld v. Mappa

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurray T. Feiden, J.

This is a motion to cancel a lis pendens filed by plaintiff in a derivative stockholders’ action. The issue is whether the complaint states a cause of action affecting title to real property within the meaning of section 6501 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules.

The mere fact that the word “ realty ” or similar words are used in the complaint or that one of the prayers for relief seeks a transfer of title to realty, is not determinative unless supported by appropriate allegations. It is not the title of the action, nor the prayer for judgment, but the facts set out in the complaint which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weisinger v. RaeNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gross v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Hyde v. Everett Van Kleeck & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leisnoi, Inc. v. StratmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In re the Estate of SabatinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
  3. Mageloff v. SarkinNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Leisnoi, Inc. v. StratmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Leisnoi, Inc. v. StratmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API