Legal Opinion
Hyde v. Everett Van Kleeck & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonald S. Taylor, J.
Plaintiffs, Hyde as the owner of a past-due note, and Morris and Ortmann as minority stockholders of defendant corporation, sue for an injunction restraining defend*376ant corporation and the individual defendant, as president, from consummating a contract of sale of the corporation’s real property. Correlative relief is also sought. The defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to certain of the Rules of Civil Practice. The plaintiffs have cross-moved for a temporary injunction.
Only defendants’ motion pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 to dismiss the complaint for legal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Isaac v. MarcusNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Buttles v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Myer v. MyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Niles v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rubinfeld v. MappaNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Zeiler v. Work Wear Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978