Leisnoi, Inc. v. Stratman
Alaska Supreme Court
1DissentMoore, Justice
In spite of the complex factual setting of this case, the issues here are simple. First of all, did Koniag have the legal authority to enter into a binding agreement with Stratman and Burton? Secondly, if Koniag had such legal authority, are Stratman and Burton entitled to specific performance against Leisnoi, Koniag’s successor?
The majority concludes, and I agree, that under Alaska corporations law, Koniag acquired all of the rights, powers, interest and obligations of Leisnoi as a result of the merger, and that, at the time of the Strat-man Agreement, Koniag had the authority to contract to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Municipality of Anchorage v. SchneiderAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Blake v. GilbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Hall v. Add-Ventures, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Mohican Valley, Inc. v. MacDonaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.