Leisnoi, Inc. v. Stratman
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
In late 1985 and early 1986, Kodiak Island residents Omar Stratman, Mabel Marie Rice, Antoinette Burton and James Burton (Plaintiffs) instituted separate actions against Leisnoi, Inc. (Leisnoi) and Koniag, Inc. (Koniag) seeking specific performance of a settlement agreement which they had negotiated with Koniag. At the time of negotiation and signing of the settlement, Leisnoi had merged with Koniag and did not exist as a separate corporate entity. Later, the merger was set aside. Leisnoi claimed it was not bound by Koniag’s settlement agreement with the Plaintiffs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Omar Stratman v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Hall v. Add-Ventures, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Hausam v. WodrichAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. Omar StratmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Riddell v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. StratmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Watega v. WategaAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Stratman v. Leisnoi, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.