Legal Opinion

Kersey's Case

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 6, 2002No. LD-2001-006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

Pursuant to New Hampshire Supreme Court Rule 37(10), the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (committee) petitioned for reciprocal discipline proceedings against the respondent, George E. Kersey. The respondent has two pending contempt orders in Vermont. Based upon these contempt orders, the respondent’s license to practice law in Massachusetts was suspended, as of September 10, 1999, for three months. We ordered the committee to file a report advising whether the respondent had purged himself of contempt in the Vermont court and whether the respondent had been' reinstated to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Drucker's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re KerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Kersey's CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. In Re: Kersey v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re KerseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. In re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API