Rodriguez v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLMAN, Justice.
Appellant Carlos Rodriguez a/k/a Jose Luna appeals his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender. In his first point, Appellant argues that the requirement to register for life as a sex offender is a violation of the ex post facto clause of the United States and Texas Constitutions. In his second point, Appellant argues the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
On January 26, 1987, Appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault with a deadly weapon…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Varnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- State v. HaskellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Dean v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Holcomb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.