Legal Opinion
State v. Haskell
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 5, 2001PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] Brian S. Haskell Sr. appeals from the application of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act of 1999 (“SOR-NA”) 1 in his case after a judgment of conviction was entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Pierson, J.) on a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful sexual contact in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255(1)(C) (Supp.2000) (Class C). 2 Haskell contends that: (1) SORNA, as it applies to him, is an ex post facto law that is prohibited by the Constitutions of the State of Maine and of the United States and (2) the Sentencing Court’s alleged specification of him as a…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. RachelWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LetalienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- R.W. v. SandersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- State v. ShepleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.