Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided September 10, 2004No. 03-04-00063-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN F. ONION, JR., Justice.

Appellant Ryan Kenneth Holcomb appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, to wit: cocaine in an amount of less than one gram. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(b) (West 2003). The trial court assessed punishment at two years in the state jail but suspended the imposition of sentence and placed appellant on community supervision (probation) for a term of five years subject to certain conditions.

Points of Error

Appellant advances three points of error stated in terms of issues as follows:

Issue 1: House Bill 2668 1 does not…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pomier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  3. Babak Taherzadeh v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2022
  4. Bruce Wayne Harbour v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. Bruce Wayne Harbour v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API