Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 5, 2012No. 01-10-00376-CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant, Karl Christopher Harris, of the second degree felony offense of failure to comply with the sex offender registration requirements. 1 After it found the allegations in an enhancement paragraph true, the trial court assessed punishment at twenty years’ confinement. In three issues, appellant contends that: (1) the State did not present sufficient evidence that he intentionally and knowingly failed to verify his sex offender registration information within the required time period; (2) the trial court improperly punished him for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Frabon Crocker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  2. William David Kelley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  3. Clister Ray Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  4. Christopher Arthur Tatum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. Vandyke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API