Odd Fellows' Savings Bank v. Brander
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County and from an order denying a new trial. E. A. Davis, " Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to foreclose the rights of a vendee under a contract for the purchase and sale of land. PlaintiE had the decree, from which, and from an order denying defend*256ants’ motion for a new trial, defendants appeal. Findings of fact were waived, and the cause was heard upon a “stipulated statement of facts,” from which the following appear: “On June 10, 1892, plaintiff and defendant Brander entered into an agreement by which plaintiff agreed to sell and Brander agreed to purchase certain twenty-nine thousand acres of land, situated in the county of Sutter, for the sum of fifty…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Hansbrough v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Ketchum & Sweet v. EvertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Sparks v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Cross v. MayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Petersen v. HartellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Kay v. KayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.