Legal Opinion
Mainline Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Nutrite Corp.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided August 12, 1996No. 2:95-cv-00009PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
This is an action for loss resulting from a reduced crop yield allegedly caused by the failure of an herbicide, sold by Nutrite Corporation (“Nutrite”) and manufactured by Monsanto Company (“Monsanto”), to effectively control crabgrass. Pending before the Court is Defendant Monsanto’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 Plaintiffs oppose this motion. Plaintiffs’ complaint against Monsanto is predicated on theories of strict liability, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of express and implied warranties. In its motion, Monsanto,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Paquette v. Deere and Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Moffitt v. Icynene, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2005
- Adel v. Greensprings of Vermont, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2005
- Hand v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. Vermont · 1998
- Dusharm v. Nationwide InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.