Legal Opinion

Dusharm v. Nationwide Insurance

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided April 29, 1999No. 2:97-CV-371PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SESSIONS, District Judge.

In this complaint for declaratory relief, Plaintiff Danielle Lee Dusharm seeks a judgment that Defendant Nationwide Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) is obligated to provide underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage for her under policies issued by Nationwide to her father and her mother. The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. At issue is whether Nationwide must provide UIM coverage when the tortfeasor motorist’s insurance coverage is unavailable to Dusharm due to multiple claimants. To date, the issue has not been addressed by the Vermont…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Rodriguez v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. Alexander & Alexander Services, Inc. v. These Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Marian R. Canedy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Halsey v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API