Legal Opinion

Paquette v. Deere and Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 4, 1998No. 97-389PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Plaintiffs appeal the superior court’s order dismissing their suit seeking compensation for economic losses incurred when they traded in their allegedly defective motor home. We conclude that plaintiffs’ warranty claims were not brought within the relevant limitations period, and that their products liability claims could not be based upon the purely economic losses incurred in this particular case. Accordingly, we affirm the superior court’s judgment.

Because judgment was granted on the pleadings in this case, we accept as true all well pleaded factual allegations contained in the complaint…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Washington Water Power Co. v. Graybar Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bocre Leasing Corp. v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Springfield Hydroelectric Co. v. CoppSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sorge v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Long Trail House Condominium Assoc. v. Engelberth Construction, Inc. v. Morgan's Roofing & ConstructionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. Hamill v. Pawtucket Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API