Legal Opinion

Treviño & Gonzalez Co. v. R.F. Muller Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 30, 1997No. 04-96-00801-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANGELINI, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellees, R.F. Muller Co. and the City of Laredo, in a breach of contract case. In one point of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to rule in its favor. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

Appellant, the Treviño & Gonzalez Company, operates its place of business on a plat of property that abuts a street over which the City of Laredo has a utility easement. The present suit was brought by appellant to recover damages caused by the removal of shrubbery and a concrete overlay appellant had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roberson v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Christiansen v. PrezelskiTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Farm Lloyds v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Guthrie v. National Homes CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Otis Elevator Co. v. ParmeleeTexas Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Maguire Oil Co. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  2. Patzer v. City of LovelandColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Port Arthur Independent School District v. Port Arthur Teachers Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1999
  4. Thomas Learning Center, Inc. v. McGuirkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. Heideman v. Washington CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API