Legal Opinion

Longmire v. Kruger

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 1926No. Docket No. 3167PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment canceling a deed of conveyance upon the ground of undue influence. The complaint also charged that the deed was the product of an unsound mind, and that it was procured by fraud. Upon both of these last-mentioned issues the trial court found for the defendant. The only question involved in this appeal is whether the findings and judgment are supported by the evidence.

For many years prior to the execution of the deed in question Madura Coyle, an old, partially blind and feeble widow, resided with her grandson, Hartley Kruger, at her home…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Harding v. WheatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  3. MacKall v. MacKallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Shipman v. FurnissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Sparks v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Best v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Goldman v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Sparks v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API