Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Anderson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1921No. S. F. No. 9071PublishedCited by 75 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing the admission to probate of a certain holographic instrument purporting to be the will of Hazel Anderson, deceased. The order was made after formal contest and jury trial. The authenticity of the instrument was not questioned, and the grounds of contest' assigned were that it had been executed under the undue influence of the proponent, who was the sole beneficiary and is the appellant here, that it had been executed when the testatrix was of unsound mind, and that it had been revoked. At the trial a nonsuit was granted as to the two latter grounds,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API