Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Goldman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1953No. Civ. 19141PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From a judgment quieting title in Dorothy Goldman and decreeing that she is entitled to possession of Lot 23, Tract 450, in Los Angeles County, appellants Louis and Shirley Goldman have transferred the matter by appeal to this court.
It appears that after Benjamin Goldman had reached his 60th year and was the father of Louis and three daughters, he married Dorothy in 1944 in Nevada. On November 9, 1945, they purchased Lot 23 and took the title as joint tenants, respondent paying $6,000 of her separate funds on the purchase price of $20,000. Respondent and her husband resided in the structure…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Peterson v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Smith v. SpauldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Church of the Merciful Saviour v. Volunteers of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Estate of StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Roeder v. RoederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Donovan v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.