Moore v. Conliffe
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
In this case we must decide whether a witness who testifies at a deposition held in connection with a private, contractual arbitration proceeding is subject to being sued in a tort action on the basis of statements made in the course of such testimony, or instead, like any witness in a court proceeding, is immunized from tort liability by virtue of the “litigation privilege” embodied in Civil Code section 47, subdivision *638(b) (hereafter section 47(b)).1 As we shall explain, in view of the purpose and history of the litigation privilege and the numerous California decisions…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.