Legal Opinion

Inman v. Ollson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1958PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

Action by the plaintiffs appellant, Bert Inman, Orval Sorensen and C. L. Stuart, against the defendants respondent, Harold E. Ollson, Jack Ollson and others, to eject them as trespassers on four mining claim locations made by plaintiffs upon government lands open for mining entry in Lake County, Oregon. Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting an involuntary nonsuit.

Upon the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case, the record discloses that plaintiffs had staked out four claims on the afternoon of July 9, 1954, and at the same time posted notices containing the information required by subsections…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KrushnicSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Campbell v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tosco Corp. v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  2. ROHNER ET UX v. NevilleOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Marathon Oil Co. v. LujanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
  4. Dumas v. RoppIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Contractors, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API