Legal Opinion

Saylor v. Enterprise Electric Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The evidence contained in the record proves that the plaintiff’s intestate was accidentally killed while entering upon a public highway which was encumbered with defendant’s transmission lines carrying a dangerous current of electricity. We assume that the defendant’s lines were lawfully within the highway. However, it had no right to interfere with the reasonable use of that road by Saylor in transporting a farming implement over it. There is much uncontroverted evidence in the record supporting plaintiff’s allegation that it was a well-established custom among the farmers of the Prairie…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fitzgerald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Perham v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Commonwealth Electric Co. v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Rickard v. EllisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API