Legal Opinion

Dimor, Inc. v. City of Passaic

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 22, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

122 N.J. Super. 296 (1973)

300 A.2d 191

DIMOR, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, AND PASSAIC CINEMA, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND S.M.H. AMUSEMENT CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, INTERVENORS,

v.

CITY OF PASSAIC, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Argued January 19, 1973.

Decided January 22, 1973.

Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg argued the cause for plaintiff (Messrs. Heller & Laiks, attorneys).

Mr. H. Ronald Levine argued the cause for intervenor Passaic Cinema, Inc. (Mr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Summer v. Township of TeaneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Kennedy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Ringlieb v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. State v. UleskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  5. State v. Hudson County News Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. LlewellynMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Capitol News Co., Inc. v. METRO. GOV'T, ETC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wein v. Town of IrvingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. City of Spokane v. PortchWashington Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API