Legal Opinion

Summer v. Township of Teaneck

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 2, 1969PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Weintbaub, C. J.

This case, brought by a real estate broker, involves the validity of an ordinance of the Township of Teaneek dealing with “blockbusting.” On motion for summary judgment the trial court held the ordinance was beyond the legislative power of the municipality. We certified the Township’s appeal before argument in the Appellate Division.

Blockbusting is the practice of inducing owners of property to sell because of the actual or rumored advent into the neighborhood of a member of a racial, religious or ethnic group. The inducement is the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Chicago Real Estate Board v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Do-Wop Corp. v. City of RahwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Quick Chek Food Stores v. Township of SpringfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Hon. Dana L. Redd v. Vance Bowman(073567)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API