Legal Opinion
State v. Ulesky
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided May 5, 1969PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
2Per curiam
Defendant was convicted of violating an ordinance of the Borough of Belmar requiring registration by persons convicted of crime. The County Court affirmed the judgment, 100 N. J. Super. 287 (1968), and we certified the appeal to the Appellate Division before hearing there.
The ordinance provides that any person present in the Borough for more than 24 hours must register with the Chief of Police if within the past ten years such person has been convicted here or elsewhere of a crime or a narcotics violation. Such person must furnish a written statement…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
4Cited by35 opinions
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. CrawleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.