Legal Opinion

United States v. Mario Adamo, Richard Marsico, Terry Freeman, Raymond Ripley, Jeffrey Linkous, Ectore Garcia, and Winthrop Hong

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 22, 1984No. 82-3001 and 82-3009 to 82-3014PublishedCited by 207 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILES, District Judge.

The present appeal arises out of a complex factual setting, yet poses legal questions which with one exception are neither novel nor unfamiliar. The Court has carefully scrutinized the entire record, and is quite familiar with all the facets of the prior proceedings. • Because the analysis of each individual issue presented requires extended factual explanation, the usual detailed recitation of “facts” will not be indulged at the outset. Facts will be supplied throughout this opinion where such elaboration will be helpful in understanding the issues under consideration.

Pu…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by207 opinions

  1. United States v. Yervin K. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Ernest Martin v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API