Legal Opinion

Ernest Martin v. Betty Mitchell, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 28, 2002No. 00-3357, 00-3359PublishedCited by 282 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Ernest Martin, an Ohio death row inmate, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). The respondent warden will be referred to as the “State.” This court granted Martin’s application for a certificate of appealability (“COA”), allowing review of his claims of prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, and sufficiency of the evidence, subparts of those issues, and the question of procedural default as it relates to these issues. For the reasons stated hereafter,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by282 opinions

  1. Maurice A. Mason v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Foster v. LudwickDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. Donald Mallett, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Charles L. Lorraine v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Paula McFarland v. Joan YukinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API