Wetherill v. Canney
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hicks, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
¡áTART, C. J.
Action to set aside a deed of certain real estate made by the defendants Thomas J. and Julia A. Canney to the defendant Fred N. Canney, as fraudulent - as to creditors. Trial by the court without a jury, and judgment ordered for the plaintiff, adjudging the deed fraudulent as to him, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, the defendants appealed.
*342The here material facts found by the court were substantially as follows: That on February 3, 1890, the defendant Thomas J. Canney and his wife, Julia A., in consideration of a loan of $20,-000, executed their promissory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Henry v. HinmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Camp v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
- Cortland Wagon Co. v. SharvySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Fish v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by23 opinions
- Herd v. ChambersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Thysell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- In Re Trust Created by WatlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Beneke v. Estate of BenekeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- McAlvay v. Consumers' Salt Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.