Legal Opinion

Molberg v. Marsden

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 1972No. 43342PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, a minor child, received substantial injuries in an accident, the value .of her claim far exceeding available insurance funds and defendant’s potential to pay any such judgment. The trial court approved a settlement and directed that, after the allowance for attorneys’ fees and costs, the county welfare board be reimbursed for medical expenses furnished by it. The board’s claim exceeds the remaining funds, but the trial court rejected the contention of plaintiff that the recovery should be apportioned. We affirm.

The matter was submitted to this court on the following stipulated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Hickok v. MargolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Robertson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Skjefstad v. Red Wing Potteries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McKownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  2. In Re the Estate of MesserschmidtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Estate of EdhlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State, Department of Public Safety v. $6,276 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. In Re Estate of EdhlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API