Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Edhlund

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 5, 1989No. C6-89-385PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This appeal concerns a challenge by the personal representative of the estate of Rose Edhlund to the application of Minn. Stat. § 256B.15 as amended by 1987 Minn. Laws, ch. 403, art. 2, § 82 effective date August 1, 1987. Appellant contends respondent Blue Earth County Human Services’ claim for a medical assistance lien is an impermissible retroactive application of the statute. The trial court ruled that the claim for benefits was not a retroactive application of the statute and that the plain language of the statute required that the claim be allowed. We reverse and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Cooper v. WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Duluth Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. In RE ESTATE OF MURPHY v. State Dept. of Pub. WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. In Re Estate of O'KeefeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GroteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. In re Estate of HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re Estate of EdhlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API