In Re Estate of Edhlund
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
This appeal concerns a challenge by the personal representative of the estate of Rose Edhlund to the application of Minn. Stat. § 256B.15 as amended by 1987 Minn. Laws, ch. 403, art. 2, § 82 effective date August 1, 1987. Appellant contends respondent Blue Earth County Human Services’ claim for a medical assistance lien is an impermissible retroactive application of the statute. The trial court ruled that the claim for benefits was not a retroactive application of the statute and that the plain language of the statute required that the claim be allowed. We reverse and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Cooper v. WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Duluth Firemen's Relief Ass'n v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- In RE ESTATE OF MURPHY v. State Dept. of Pub. WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re Estate of O'KeefeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Estate of GroteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In re Estate of HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Estate of EdhlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989