Legal Opinion

Loew v. Hagerle Brothers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1946No. 34,240PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

This case comes here on certiorari from the industrial commission to review an order denying relator’s petition that there be paid to him the sum of $2,500 from a special fund created by L. 1941, c. 384, Minn. St. 1941, § 176.13 (Mason St. 1941 Supp. § 4276), as amended by L. 1945, c. 106.

June 13, 1925, Peter Loew was injured in the course of his employment. He sustained disability from June 15, 1925, for which the industrial commission made an award for permanent total disability, upon which the employer and insurer paid $10,000 in com pensation in installments as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. PletzSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Loew v. Hagerle BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Senske v. Fairmont & Waseca Canning Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Colclasure v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API