Legal Opinion

Hickok v. Margolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 18, 1946No. 84,181PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

This is a personal injury action and comes here on plaintiff’s appeal from an order denying his motion for new trial after a general verdict for both defendants.

Plaintiff was injured when, *at or near midnight of November 19, 1944, he was struck by a car owned by defendant Margolis then being driven by his codefendant, Trana. The evidence justified the jury in finding that, just after plaintiff had crossed the north side of University avenue in St. Paul, going east, at a point where Roy street enters the avenue from the south but does not cross it, he was struck,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowen v. PatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Naeseth v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Larson v. MontpetitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Rom v. CalhounSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Garey v. MichelsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API