Legal Opinion

Reo Motor Car Co. v. Young

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1920No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Dingeman (Harry J.), 3. Bill by the Reo Motor Car Company against Matthew A. Young for the specific performance of a contract. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The defendant for some 17 years had been a successful dealer in automobiles and accessories in the city of Detroit. In 1912 he began under a contract for a year to handle cars made by the plaintiff. *580He had a desirable location at 752-758 Woodward avenue, with a service station on Forest avenue east. This property, at the time of the transaction out of which this litigation arose, was leased from three different owners under leases hereinafter more particularly described. The parties seem to have been mutually satisfied with their dealings and new contracts were entered into for succeeding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rust v. ConradMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Brown v. MungerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Nowicki v. KopelczakMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reinink v. Van LoozenoordMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Woods v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. M & D ROBINSON CO. v. DunitzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. St. Pierre v. MassonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Gillette v. Metzgar Register Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API