Wynn v. Estate of Holmes
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.
In this malpractice action against the estate of a deceased accountant, the plaintiffs seek recovery of interest assessed by the Internal Revenue Service on the delinquent payment of income taxes as a result of the accountant’s error in preparing their federal income tax return.
The trial court held that the plaintiffs’ action was not barred by the statute of limitations and, among other things, awarded them judgment for the interest penalty.
The defending estate appeals. We affirm.
I
The plaintiffs, Glenn and Eddie Wynn, had employed accountant Dick Holmes for a number of years…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Loyal Order of Moose, Lodge 1785 v. CavanessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Streib v. VeigelIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Funnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Chisholm v. ScottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Stroud v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Burns v. McClintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Ronson v. TalesnickDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.