Legal Opinion

Homer Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Kenai

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1991No. S-3508PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

In this case, the Alaska Public Utilities Commission (APUC) decided a dispute over who should bear the costs of relocating a utility’s equipment in a municipal right of way when the municipality’s own improvement project made the relocation necessary. On administrative appeal, the superi- or court found that the APUC had acted beyond its jurisdiction. We disagree. Accordingly, we reverse the superior court’s decision on the jurisdictional issue and remand for appellate review of the underlying APUC decision.

I

In 1971, the City of Kenai (City) and Homer Electric…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Millman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  2. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. El Vadito De Los Cerrillos Water Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Service CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of Allen v. Public Utility Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Colville Environmental Services, Inc. v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API