Legal Opinion

Ladson v. BPM CORP.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Rocky Ladson (Ladson) brought an action against BPM Corporation (BPM) and its manager, Leigh Patten (Patten) to recover damages caused when BPM’s cattle and sheep repeatedly crossed onto Ladson’s property. A trial court granted Ladson damages and issued a permanent injunction barring BPM from keeping any livestock adjacent to Ladson’s property. BPM and Patten now appeal, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] Ladson and BPM own adjacent property in Butte County, South Dakota. BPM is a South Dakota corporation with its principle…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hendrickson v. Wagners, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sjomeling v. StuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Upper Plains Contracting Inc. v. Pepsi AmericasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blair-Arch v. ArchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Vivian Scott Trust v. ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Vivian Scott Trust v. ParkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API