Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

National Labor Relations Board v. Rubatex Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1979No. 78-1341Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*152ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, District Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I would agree with the majority that the acts in question of representatives of Ruba-tex Corporation amount to a violation of §§ 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act. While I would also agree that the injunctive relief ordered by the Board was appropriate under the circumstances here, I would not grant enforcement of that part of the Board’s order requiring Rubatex to pay the substantial sum of $82,000 to 821 union employees because of the payment of merely $1,000 to thirteen union members who…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Local 60, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. District 50, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API